Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the art world in many ways. From generating stunning digital paintings to composing music, AI technology has made it possible for artists to create works in a way that was never possible before. However, the rise of AI art has also brought up a new challenge – the question of who owns the copyright to these works.
Images created in Midjourney by Aditi Shastry
Who owns the art?
Traditionally, copyright law has been clear-cut when it comes to human-created art. The artist who creates a work is considered the author and is entitled to the rights of that work. But what happens when the artwork is created by an AI algorithm, and there is no human artist to claim authorship? This is the AI art copyright problem. The copyright law in most countries states that a work must be original and the product of human authorship to be eligible for protection. This creates a gray area when it comes to AI art as the works are generated through algorithms and computer programs rather than human creativity. In some cases, the creator of the AI algorithm that generates the art can claim ownership, but it is still uncertain whether this will hold up in court. Some experts argue that AI-generated art should be considered a collaboration between the creator of the algorithm and the AI itself.
Can you sell the art?
The copyright issue with AI art is further complicated by the fact that the works themselves are unique and cannot be replicated by anyone else, including the original creators. This makes it difficult to determine who has the right to reproduce or sell the works.
The short answer is, Yes! You can sell the artworks but, many AI engines state some interesting things in their terms and conditions, like by using their services you grant the AI engine a copyright licence to reproduce, modify, publicly display, sublicense and distribute the text prompts or assets produced by the service. This means that the AI engines can sell and earn profits from your AI art.
Are all works of art truly original?
In my view, every work of art is influenced by other works of art, meaning that there is no such thing as originality, only unique combinations of existing elements. The distinction lies only in the fact that one is created by a human with traditional tools like a paintbrush and paints, while the other is produced by a human utilizing machines and algorithms as their instruments, both drawing from prior exposure and inspiration.
A grey area
The ease of replicating copyrighted characters or assets in AI art raises questions about potential copyright infringement. Currently, the legality of this issue remains unclear, with differing opinions and interpretations. As more cases involving AI art arise, countries are likely to establish clearer regulations and laws to address these concerns.
In conclusion, the AI art copyright problem is a complex issue that has yet to be fully resolved. It is important for artists, copyright lawyers, and policy makers to work together to create a system that ensures AI-generated art is protected while also recognizing the contributions of the AI technology and its creators. Until then, the AI art market will continue to operate in a state of uncertainty, leaving both buyers and sellers at risk.
It is crucial to find a solution to this problem as the use of AI in art is only going to increase in the future. We need a clear and fair system that protects the rights of all parties involved and ensures that AI art can thrive and be valued as a legitimate form of art.
Comments